Skip to content
localmodel.run

text model · llama · macOS

Can I run Llama 3.3 70B on Apple M3 Ultra (256GB)?

Compatibility verdict VRAM threshold engine
Yes, it runsusable speed

Yes. Llama 3.3 70B runs on Apple M3 Ultra (256GB) at Q4_K_M (~45.3 GB of ~192 GB usable).

Needs ~45.3 GB Device usable ~192 GB

Runs at Q4_K_M using ~45.3 GB of ~192 GB usable. You have room for FP16 for higher quality.

Q4_K_M needed
~45.3 GB
Usable on device
~192 GB
Device memory
256 GB
Best quant
Q4_K_M

Run it

Install commands macOS

Pick your tool. All three load the same Q4_K_M weights.

Ollama
$ ollama run llama3.3:70b
llama.cpp
$ llama-cli -hf bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
$ lms get bartowski/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-GGUF

vLLM is NOT a Mac tool, it is a CUDA/Linux serving engine. Unified memory is not a fixed VRAM slice; ~70% is usable for weights.

Model llama
Parameters
70B
Q4_K_M size
42.52 GB
Q8_0 size
74.98 GB
Context
128k
Ollama tag
llama3.3:70b
Full Llama 3.3 70B requirements →
Device macOS
Memory
256 GB unified
Usable for weights
~192 GB
Best runtime
MLX direct / Ollama (MLX backend)
Best models for Apple M3 Ultra (256GB) →

You could also run

Run Llama 3.3 70B on other hardware

FAQ

Can Apple M3 Ultra (256GB) run Llama 3.3 70B?

Yes. Llama 3.3 70B runs on Apple M3 Ultra (256GB) at Q4_K_M (~45.3 GB of ~192 GB usable).

How much memory does Llama 3.3 70B need?

Apple M3 Ultra (256GB) has room to spare. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~42.52 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~45.3 GB at a 4k context.

What is the best tool to run Llama 3.3 70B on macOS?

LM Studio for a simple setup; mlx-lm for the most speed. vLLM is NOT a Mac tool, it is a CUDA/Linux serving engine. Unified memory is not a fixed VRAM slice; ~70% is usable for weights.

Sources

Memory figures are estimates. See methodology.