text model · Sarvam · Windows
S Can I run Sarvam-105B on AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB)?
No. Sarvam-105B needs ~67.5 GB even at Q4_K_M, but AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) only has ~23 GB usable.
Needs ~67.5 GB even at Q4_K_M, but only ~23 GB is usable.
- Q4_K_M needed
- ~67.5 GB
- Usable on device
- ~23 GB
- Device memory
- 24 GB
How to run it
On Windows use LM Studio (Best GUI on Windows, auto-detects CUDA/Vulkan backends.). AMD GPUs run via Vulkan/ROCm at roughly half CUDA throughput. NVIDIA is the smooth path on Windows.
- Parameters
- 105B (MoE, 10.3B active)
- Q4_K_M size
- 64.2 GB
- Context
- 128k
- Memory
- 24 GB vram
- Usable for weights
- ~23 GB
- Best runtime
- Ollama (ROCm) / llama.cpp ROCm (Linux)
What you can run instead
Run Sarvam-105B on other hardware
FAQ
Can AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) run Sarvam-105B?
No. Sarvam-105B needs ~67.5 GB even at Q4_K_M, but AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) only has ~23 GB usable.
How much memory does Sarvam-105B need?
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (24GB) does not have enough memory. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~64.2 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~67.5 GB at a 4k context. It is a Mixture-of-Experts model (105B total / 10.3B active), so all experts must stay in memory; memory tracks total params, not active params.
What is the best tool to run Sarvam-105B on Windows?
LM Studio for a simple setup; Ollama (CUDA) for the most speed. AMD GPUs run via Vulkan/ROCm at roughly half CUDA throughput. NVIDIA is the smooth path on Windows.
Sources
Memory figures are estimates. See methodology.