Skip to content
localmodel.run

text model · Sarvam · macOS

S Can I run Sarvam-30B on Apple M3 Pro (18GB)?

Compatibility verdict VRAM threshold engine
No, not enough memorywould not load

No. Sarvam-30B needs ~21.7 GB even at Q4_K_M, but Apple M3 Pro (18GB) only has ~12 GB usable.

Needs ~21.7 GB Device usable ~12 GB

Needs ~21.7 GB even at Q4_K_M, but only ~12 GB is usable.

Q4_K_M needed
~21.7 GB
Usable on device
~12 GB
Device memory
18 GB

How to run it

On macOS use LM Studio (Polished GUI, ships MLX on Apple Silicon, one-click model downloads.). vLLM is NOT a Mac tool, it is a CUDA/Linux serving engine. Unified memory is not a fixed VRAM slice; ~70% is usable for weights.

Model Sarvam
Parameters
30B (MoE, 2.4B active)
Q4_K_M size
19.6 GB
Context
64k
Full Sarvam-30B requirements →
Device macOS
Memory
18 GB unified
Usable for weights
~12 GB
Best runtime
Ollama (llama.cpp Metal backend) / MLX
Best models for Apple M3 Pro (18GB) →

What you can run instead

Run Sarvam-30B on other hardware

FAQ

Can Apple M3 Pro (18GB) run Sarvam-30B?

No. Sarvam-30B needs ~21.7 GB even at Q4_K_M, but Apple M3 Pro (18GB) only has ~12 GB usable.

How much memory does Sarvam-30B need?

Apple M3 Pro (18GB) does not have enough memory. At Q4_K_M the weights are ~19.6 GB; with KV cache and runtime overhead, budget ~21.7 GB at a 4k context. It is a Mixture-of-Experts model (30B total / 2.4B active), so all experts must stay in memory; memory tracks total params, not active params.

What is the best tool to run Sarvam-30B on macOS?

LM Studio for a simple setup; mlx-lm for the most speed. vLLM is NOT a Mac tool, it is a CUDA/Linux serving engine. Unified memory is not a fixed VRAM slice; ~70% is usable for weights.

Sources

Memory figures are estimates. See methodology.